Breaking News
investors file lawsuit against sprout social over securities law violations 12

Stock Market

Investors File Lawsuit Against Sprout Social Over Securities Law Violations


Michael Chen

May 15, 2024 - 00:36 am


Investors Alerted: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Sprout Social

NEW YORK, May 14, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- The renowned law firm, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, widely acknowledged for its proficient legal services, has announced the filing of a class action lawsuit against Sprout Social, Inc. ("Sprout" or "the Company") (NASDAQ: SPT) and a number of its executive officers.

Class Action Details:

Investors are currently being invited to come forward in an attempt to recoup damages for what are claimed to be breaches of the federal securities laws. This lawsuit is representing all persons and entities who bought or acquired securities of Sprout between November 2, 2023, and May 2, 2024, a period now being referred to as the "Class Period". Those claiming to have been impacted are encouraged to join the lawsuit by visiting the law firm's website at

The lawsuit claims that during the aforementioned Class Period, Sprout Social's Defendants allegedly issued materially misleading and false statements. Moreover, it is alleged that they failed to reveal crucial adverse facts about the company's business operations and potential growth. Specifically, the Defendants are accused of failing to disclose to investors:

  1. That the Company's sales and marketing strategies, ostensibly indicating growth, were deceptive as the firm was moving towards an enterprise sales cycle.
  2. Obstacles were being faced due to the integration of Tagger, which Sprout had recently acquired.
  3. As a direct consequence of these integration challenges, the company was purportedly creating its own "sales headwinds."
  4. Notably, it resulted in the company revising its revenue expectations for the fiscal year 2024 downward.
  5. The culmination of these factors meant that the Defendants' positive declarations regarding the business, operation, and prospects of Sprout Social were significantly misleading and lacked a firm basis in reality.

Legal Proceedings and Next Steps:

A class action lawsuit is already in motion. Curious parties can gain access to the details of the Complaint by either visiting the firm's website or by reaching out directly to Peretz Bronstein, Esq., or Nathan Miller, the Client Relations Manager at Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, by dialing 332-239-2660. For investors who have suffered a loss in Sprout, there is a cut-off date of July 12, 2024, by which they must petition the court for appointment as the lead plaintiff. Participation in any financial recovery does not necessitate serving as the lead plaintiff.

No Financial Burden on Claimants:

The law firm of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, emphasizes that they will represent the claimants in this class action lawsuit on a contingency fee basis. This indicates that they will only request reimbursement for their out-of-pocket expenditures and attorneys' fees, which are typically a portion of the total recovery sum, should they successfully secure a favorable outcome.

About the Legal Representatives:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC stands tall as a firm with national recognition, representing investors in securities fraud class actions as well as shareholder derivative suits. Their track record is impressive, having recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved investors across the United States.

Contact Information:

For further information or legal assistance, investors and interested parties may contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Nathan Miller,
Telephone: 332-239-2660
Email: [email protected]

*Attorney advertising. Past outcomes are not a guarantee of similar future results.

Source: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

While the news of the class action lawsuit against Sprout Social has certainly taken center stage, it is essential for potential plaintiffs to understand the gravity of the allegations against the company. The detailed accusations highlight a scenario where the company's leadership is said to have been aware of the underlying problems facing the business yet chose not to disclose such vital information to their investors. The implications of such an omission are severe, as they potentially disrupted the ability of investors to make fully informed decisions regarding their investments in Sprout Social.

The law firm leading this charge, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, has laid out a clear path for those who believe they have been wronged to seek justice. By providing the means for individuals and entities to join the class action lawsuit, they have leveled the playing field, allowing the small investor the same opportunity to have their voices heard as large institutional investors. The firm's utilization of a contingency fee basis for the lawsuit further evinces their confidence in their case and dedication to their clients, ensuring that those impacted can seek legal redress without the fear of upfront financial burdens.

Additionally, with the deadline for the appointment as the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit looming, the imperative for investors to act swiftly and decisively becomes even more critical. Serving as a lead plaintiff provides a more prominent role within the litigation, permitting the investor to potentially influence the direction and the decisions made throughout the lawsuit. However, as made evident by the law firm, even those who do not wish to take on this role can still share in any potential recovery, the only requisite being that they are part of the class represented by the case.

The class action lawsuit against Sprout Social represents a significant development in the ongoing scrutiny of corporate governance and the transparency obligations of public companies. As the legal process unfolds, it will indeed shed light on the vital need for businesses, especially publicly-traded entities, to uphold the highest standards of honesty and integrity in their communications with investors. As the legal representatives dig deeper into the case, it is probable that the unfolding events will serve as a potent reminder to other corporations to stay true to the principle of providing clear, accurate, and timely information to all their stakeholders.

Given the serious nature of the allegations, the eventual outcome of this lawsuit is poised to have ramifications beyond the immediate parties involved. Should the plaintiffs secure a successful verdict, it might serve as a blueprint for future litigation involving similar cases of alleged securities frauds. This process might also encourage regulatory bodies to take a more stringent approach towards companies that operate in grey areas of disclosure laws, possibly catalyzing a shift towards greater enforcement and possibly new regulations designed to protect investors and uphold the integrity of the financial markets.

As with any lawsuit of this nature, it is essential for participants to be fully informed of their rights and the process. Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman's website serves as a resourceful platform in this regard, providing access not only to the complaint but also providing the necessary contact information for those seeking to consult with the legal team directly. The firm's readiness to communicate via both telephone and email indicates their commitment to accessibility and their eagerness to assist those affected.

Ultimately, the lawsuit against Sprout Social spotlights the ongoing battle against corporate misrepresentations and the importance of a legal framework that supports accountability. For investors caught in the wake of such alleged deceptions, the active stance taken by Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC offers a conduit to potential recompense. As the case progresses, the investment community will be watching closely, aware that the outcome of this class action has the potential to influence the landscape of securities law for years to come.